Should've Done Then

02/05/2025

In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

Genesis 3:19

At this point, the Lord uses his powers in Naphtalim to define from whence man is taken or reaped as given life of himself and thus will return to it of course. Man should've probably seen beautiful things by Issachar standards from there but it's just not possible when there's the ground in the view or is it from there. Then again, the sweat of the face implies something to be gained for the pain or hope in the purpose which for some small thing in exchange, there's work of a sort as well as some hope in the journey. What the ground wants though merely is to be tended and dressed from the first. Only disruptions in nature as after the manner of Cain and of Abel are responsible for resetting the ground, turning it angry and cruel, with vengeance even now that it's mentioned. It's a sad thing really this giving and taking as though the ground hadn't lacked for a purpose as seen from the first. Though it makes no sense to return man on back to the ground when there's this adversarial relationship for which each have struggled. With beautiful things conflicting in view, though only buried just for a bit, lies the hope that soon they'll spring forth once again as life comes from the earth and too with the change of the seasons. With that, power comes the knowledge very much surely that it's desert now in the dust but not for long in the making as Solomon says he's made all things beautiful in his time. I'm not sure at first what you're originally thinking but it's so on only from there. With the rain really comes life once again As the fields once more emerge from the dust and with them the flowers growing though wild but of course. All that's wanted then is just a bit of tending then of the sort, much as man should've been when he was lacking for clothes.