Organizational Functions

The organizational setting is a hospital network, an area known for its oversight over many various clinics and regions. Site specialties management includes nurses, doctors, and certified nursing assistants as well as a whole host of other administrators. Furthermore, the care practice is graded as a whole by surveys and numbers. These provide insight into how the person's experience was with their care as well as whether or not their health was improving. Data from these surveys are then tabulated and compared with other pieces of data such as staff satisfaction scores and a few other factors. Teamwork and working together with minimal friction is also something that most administrators of systems are highly interested in improving without a task-base that stems from the care, that is from a management perspective at least if not one economically speaking. The other things of note are the caregiving outcomes in accordance with best research practices, of which personal care is definitely a factor. With these factors in mind, the possibility of using person centered care as a perspective to reduce the task base in question has definitely been raised as an issue. The proposal question reflects this much rather with whether using communication-based measures in a personal care organization will result in a more idealized model of care with results to the person as compared with the current task-base in care that is the historical standard.

Purpose and Objectives

The purpose of the additional research is namely to restore balance to the care that has faltered from a personal perspective. The proposal will also ensure that care is being delivered in a manner that eliminates waste, coverages the system, and protects the needs of the persons as those that are wanting of somewhat consideration. Objectives follow the natural course of the care as performance in medical, nursing, and other factors are much in need for being improved. Beyond that, the personal experience and total wellness is of utmost perspective. Finally, for the last of the objectively valued, governance and excellence in care is prioritized. From there, it is only a matter of redefining the measures for the provision of culturally appropriate care from there on once more.

Literature Review

To sum it up neatly, a sustainable system of personal care should first of all have capacity, followed by organizational structures put in place with financial backing and responsibility then later all in the name of meeting the needs of care for the people. These are further described as limitations in current models of care without any others around to pick up the slack. On the whole, personal care has been known for producing the best possible outcomes thus far. In particular, personal care achieves better care as a whole though to some level there is a recognizable gap when it comes to personal experience and wellness outcomes as these move around through the system. These gaps are observable on a somewhat personal level between outcomes and implementation processes. In addition, the capacity to be able to provide care then as needed becomes much more than just an adaptability in systems but rather a personal care approach on the whole.

When it comes on down to it really, capacity becomes so much more than simply the caring ability but also that of response to the person. This leads some to the belief that emotions are central to care with difficulties in interpreting them in modern-day practice with the walls of the feeling like they're closing in at times very much rather. Between management feeling a lack on their part in general for the provision of care that is required from the system, it seems other perspectives would have to be introduced as required then in general. Though not for nursing at least for the first since forty percent or so of tasks are care duties with considerable levels of work intensity being directed and the other thirty-eight percent being indirect functions such as documentation and upkeep of computer records and systems. Financial responsibility is all about the care that can be afforded thus far. In this case, the delegation of care is characterized as unhelpful at best and at worst leaving large holes or gaps in the care for people to slip through the system. Thusly, the personal perspective of care is made up of the actualized needs as these have come into being. Care as always is fully conceptualized when the needs of the persons have been met as considered. While not an exact science of sorts, it is still enough to report some recent models of shifting care from the current focus of being whether with personal needs, expectations, wants in the matter, or just providers much rather.

Finally, the last few matters bear consideration of course that personal care and the reduction of task base much rather is essential to keeping the provision thereof some sort of going. In form or in substance, it seems for that is what powers the whole. Certainly, the provision of personal care and best practice may not be diametrically opposed not at least as far as one would consider of those. Research of this type supports acknowledgement, introduction, duration, explanation, and gratitude as an implementation model of general being. So far, difficulty has been established between communication and technicality which leaves some wondering whether these things should rightfully happen since care that does not occur is as devoid of whatever meaning supposed. As further research suggests, there is linkage between communication and care being established that just does not happen as much as it would otherwise be or from what would normally happen were it in other circles much earlier.

Barriers

Barriers that contribute to the reduction of task-base in care include present nursing knowledge, decades of teaching, and other scientific exploits in full. Present nursing knowledge, for instance, is certainly a powerful weapon that keeps the personal care from ever being firmly actualized into practice. Decades of teaching with a task-based focus in learning means that there is nothing to stop this occurring which in return keeps the whole cycle on-going. The scientific exploits also mean that nurses are praised for their heroism often with disasterous results in the end though the personal outcomes might look good for the time intervening that since has come into being.

Facilitators

Other facilitators that aid in the reduction of task-base in nursing include communication which keeps this sort of issue just from occurring. Communication that occurs with the persons whether those receiving the care or the providers themselves allows it to happen. Traditionally also, the personal perspective aids in communication rather as talk with the persons are what keeps it occurring. This then is what sets a care plan in motion as wishes are accessed and followed with results then being based upon what is best for the person.

Conceptual Framework

The theoretical construct model of communication being used is referred to quite simply as the personal care and communication continuum. In this case, the theoretical model is idealized as a whole logical spectrum with one of three possible angles. The task-base in care sits to the left of the spectrum with on the whole it encapsulating the entirety of most of the system. Process-centered care is right in the middle which is where changes like the personal care model have put it much rather. On the far right hand side of the spectrum, there is the person-centered focus again which is about as idealized as far as these things go really because it rarely never happens except where perfect institutions have met in the middle.

Project Outcomes

Outcomes are as conceivably follows that people want only one or two things really: to be known, to be supported, and to be loved on the journey. Ideally, it is not calling the person family but some sure would like it much rather. Based on these guidelines, the provision of care forms a system in which crisis management and de-escalation will take care of itself. This sort of action will also reduce the need for apology and error which allows revictimization to happen along with a number of other financial, psychosocial, mental, physical, and stressor in addition to cultural and personal factors. Practically speaking, this is the most universal in model to a system utilized by everyone very much rather. When communication is the focus, it must be positive, universally true, caring, and compassionate otherwise. In which case, feedback can be explained through the personal perspective in general with positive themes due to a reversal in focus. The only thing that changes is your perspective with a homelike atmosphere emphasized, treatment, and comfort besides. At times there may be allowance for silence versus an abundance of noise. It is a focus where actions are doing most of the speaking in which words cannot otherwise. In times like these, it is not a reading the room but a reflection of who these are as a person.

The care focus in general is assessed as a problem in particular later. It is important to remember that as in all things, the importance of observation cannot be underestimated and then asking questions of the right sort again later. Fall risk screening, for instance, is something redundant that can be assessed based from off the gait. More appropriate follow-up questions that are better off asked include the timing of onset, duration, and the effects on the person. This sort of focus surmizes that each person is responsible for the care they create or the personal tone then that follows. Doing so removes the provider from a helpless perspective while eliminating repetition in practice, the chain of command, as well as the need to have twenty plus observers gathered around in a room. Initially, assumptions are avoided in general language. Fall risk, for instance, is best handled with some matter of fact statements. Do not be surprised though if the persons are having a different thing that they value or if their self-image say does not match-up as it should. That is where a value-based assessment comes in as part of a focus in general that the care provided will go on from there. A non-confrontational approach also ensures that the provider is both pleasant and likable.

Still, there is always room for a task-base in learning. Just make sure that tasks do not get in the way of the care that is rendered or so on from there. Think of each encounter not as negotiation but as a being willing to see what both sides have to bring to the table. At this point, the care will be much better able to meet in the middle with both sides being considered. At this particular juncture any tests that are done will be viewed as helpful rather than harmful now and again. Results are conveyed with expectations of dialogue along with medical differential in systems while personal values and experiences thus far are considered. Any medical treatment that is rendered should also follow the same sort of system with personal wishes being respected. Conditional treatment should come with the same sorts of options. Of course, things are slightly different with long-standing care that is rendered with people being treated more like an old friend or a relative. If able, try not switching these people around all over the system. There is a continuity in focus of care then much rather with a willingness to change or revisit the system as needs arise from what has not already been working.

None is more so true than in the care that is given to men or women, any religion or culture, or maybe just to people in general. Engagement with value is how to keep disconnect from creeping in to the question. This as a whole means memorability is just out of the question. Emotional recognition and engagement with value along with statements of meaning are much more than just statements of being. It is insertive of feeling, aquiring of words to the meanings where upset is just a symptom of where silent is an issue. These methods are meant to engage even the most traumatic of persons. By this sort of engaging in creation of meaning, this forms the release valve for a not too far distant set of expression. Though it is important not to be inappropriate as a provider personally in the bargain with it being though of more like some sort of dynamic in modeling. Do not forget to remain connected to the things that are valued along with professional duties rendered because they are all the things being brought to the table. Do not encourage repeated visits but only a preparation for treatment themselves in the matter. Clear guidelines can be established on when these should consider themselves due for appearance back in the clinics. Basically, it makes for a transtion approach from a do not want to be there, to discomfort, to one with total wellness in mind.

Recommendations for Practice

Indeed, the personal focus is what makes family the focus again whether providers, partners, or just those at the end as in need of the journey and along for the care being delivered on the whole there again. Dealing with emotions and the difficulty in nursing interpreting them is mainly due to the distancing that task-base in care with it would bring. Preventions include venting and distancing from all types of solutions. It is this perspective that views care as an outward focus going in to a whole task of reconnecting the person. Consequences of not fostering the reconnection again includes depersonalizing the issue as well as care that is provided in an almost inhumane way, sort, and standard. Given that nursing knowledge is linked to a lowered incidence of death and dying should something terrible happen, research suggests it is not so much about what happens but the personal connections much rather. Fostered relationships then are important for maintaining a human sort of perspective more than appropriate care levels. Current research suggests that limitations in care are due to contributing structural factors. Missing or omissions causes delay to the healthcare system in general. Instead, it is the main causative factor for the majority of medical errors. Practices of rationing or limiting care forces this perspective in general as it is linked to negative interpersonal levels and satisfaction then on the job. This single factor formed an accurate prediction of outcomes than survey scores even. Delegations of care or so called disruptions are linked to decline in personal outcomes, status, or quality then of a sort which opens the question of whose responsibility is it to care for the person. Current lack of knowledge, improper function, and perceptions cause friction in the caregiving environment in general with proper transfers including a handoff of persons. Work intensity is also linked to doing more things at the center as workloads contribute to burnout and fatigue as a unit whether provider compassion or otherwise. This focus demands a redefining of nursing, one that is rendered or so on from there as directed by decreased quality of interactions in general. Regardless, interventions at this point are better than the viewing of nursing as not just the doctors' general secretary. Recent models are shifting some tasks from doctor to nurse in the matter with a perspective of managed care in the bargain. Interventions include assessment, education, medication reconciliation, referrals, and making new orders for continued care or medical tests to be done prior to seeing the doctor even being considered. Practice changes are done with safer care than the doctors with more satisfied persons mainly in answer to physician shortages developed around in the question of one of the oldest caring professions. Preliminary research showed little to no difference in the provision of their provider counterparts in the matter.

Reflection

Learning from this project has affected more on a personal level than anything else rather. It has so far forced pet philosophies to redefine care once again. Doing matters differently requires more of a personal chore, an effort in sum to rebuild the connections with others again. Continuation in the provision of health seems certainly feasible at this point in time with the changes to the system having so after been in being refined. While personal involvement is not the point at this juncture, the possibility remains open as care begins to take shape once again. Expectations should be nothing short of whole purpose changes in care so that the system is delivering results that are needful.

Conclusion

Towards this end, personal care is making strides in becoming actualized as more than just a concept or theory and is just now being worked into being. With the changes anticipated to reduce task-base in care, it is now more than ever abundantly needed in order to improve the giving of care and ensure that reception itself is hardly the issue in general when it comes to the person regardless of certain regional or other lifestyle-type factors. As highlighted by research then earlier, these changes are definitely a must very much rather. At this time their implementation as per the proposal is anticipated greatly to reduce the personal factors that have hereby rendered receiving care from the provider an issue. In addition, these changes are expected to improve overall health outcomes and personal satisfaction scores after having presented for care in the clinics again. Hopefully these changes will also reduce the need for emergency services, thereby making repeated returns to the clinic as needed the much more probable factor.