Leadership Ethics

Professional Accountability

Maybe this whole professional business isn't rated as much as you thought. I mean, it's fine enough for me since I'm used to doing it, but now you're not as sure as perhaps you once were. There was just recently that major difference in opinion that did more than just affecting a little, it affected a lot. It was the whole issues of living standards and all things like that, then before we knew it it had spread to the food. Funny how those types of things go, through something called an economy which you don't know quite as much about that. That's why you're not really sure if I'm someone to trust. After awhile, all sorts of doubts have crept around in your brain. Perhaps I really should have seen this whole thing coming since it didn't just happen but rather was a long time in the makings or such. If there's enough warning signs it can be spotted early on but perhaps though I didn't. Then too perhaps it was best in my view to continue letting the markets run wild with the bulls, which affects everything else as no company quite knows how to stop making a profit from the human condition and healthcare's no single exception. At this point, a good leader would've been first to speak up a warning that perhaps the people should know this wasn't really the end of the story. Though if I had it would've affected my position, perhaps a little too well. Whole wars and economies have gone down on less than a single politician standing up in places like this. Perhaps though, it doesn't matter what I am at this point. I'm just another one like yourself only with a few lofty opinions from being removed, a voice, and a place to do something more with them there I suppose. Perhaps the whole point of the matter now is how to hold me accountable though it's too late from a systems perspective of those who really should have known a bit better. Besides all that, being accountable doesn't count for much more than explaining my position along with an ethical approach at how things could have been done a bit differently if at all of that. Perhaps you don't really have mind to understand it just yet. In this day and age though you've got to have something with a little more basis than that. We'll call it doing no evil or at least not so outrightly as far as harm goes. It's called nonmaleficence in the ethical world and really is quite the principle. I mean, my direct actions haven't had that much effect for sure as far as the providing of care let's say goes. That's in fact, why we've had it redefined though so that you might some better remember. This way, it covers the bases and just what is needed to ensure some sort of well-being. 

Ethical Decision-Making

Before you know it though, it's the formations of the welfare state in basis although not recognized itself as such from the first. This is due to a number of difference in opinion basically stating that the government should be able to well-care for the needs of a family. Perhaps it's not a family just yet, which in my opinion is pretty hard to maintain in present conditions. A lot then depends on remaining together no matter the issue whether I can afford to care for or not to be sure. Against all else, comes in the issue of doing some good. This is what the founders of welfare state had in mind pretty much. Only problem was they greatly underestimated their caring ability. Again, I am not here to argue the benefits of that now, perhaps maybe later. Beneficence then is the principle of only doing good to your people nor was it exactly accounted for in the creation of the current state of affairs. Bear in mind that often what sounds good in theory is not worked out well in practice. Thus what has become of some harms that were not intended then in result. Due to this and a number of other similar sort of an issues we might no longer stay together, perhaps we'll split up. To be the subject of some good that is really truly done that will last, means that we'll have to redefined what it actually means. There's not just some choices that weight the bad with the good. There's no sort of ethics or caring to be found there in that. Therefore, we'll pick choices that are only ever actually needful. These should be free of any bias or unintended ripple effects in order to be truly good for the people, so too apply there to one must apply there for the rest of the people. Often in healthcare hard choices are needed between this treatment or that, a life or a death. Even the chosen treatment actions too come with some unintended effects that are known to limit the quality of life so I've been told. Think of the quality as something that you're living a lot and the life is what is lived has been good. In fact, you're not so concerned about dying as you are risking it all at that point. It's perhaps true that not everyone gets a full hundred, yet what's a few actual years to those that have done some good in their life and received in return. These are they then that are full of a prolonging of life not to be cut down soon in their prime. It's sad indeed the righteous should so perish much less to be cut short on the earth. By some of the treatments though offered, well, there's not much of a life there left when in that should that be where it ends up. Then again, there are those of the wicked to be full of some years, which makes no sense to any such as it is. It's time though now to put our prejudices aside though and to do what's best for the people. Surely at front and center is the sustaining of life before the quality of this has entered the chat.

Collaborative Relationships

In doing so then, I can be counted on to conduct myself with veracity, that I promise always to tell you about the presenting issues effecting the way in which care is currently being delivered. That way whatever decision made affects the whole as a group and as such is decided after obtaining their expert opinion. Speaking of though that's what maintains those inappropriate silos of care. These are places where all sorts of things from medical errors on down are likely to happen. For one thing the volume of the people present within the much larger organization because the storage within makes the most of the space. Then again there's the whole issue of misappropriation of funds. The doctors all have to be paid for their work and along with them the basic care providers though perhaps not quite as much. Between there is a place known as the billing where care ends up costing a lot more than was initially needed. Some of this excess goes into the hospital for the upkeep and maintenance of buildings and grounds. The equipment too gets awful expensive there for awhile to do even the simplest forms of the care. What good is the best imaging when the simplest line graph would probably do and tell with a lot more certainty what phase of the heart the issue is actually. The same thing too occurs with the brain and a whole lot of other possible systems where the effects are seen and felt in full as the systems rather than just a bunch of tests that have shown up as tasks on the care. After that though, we've got a whole other sort of issues upon being billed for the service. That's why presentation of most issues to the hospital is entirely based on unsustainable models of care due mostly to payer, insurance, and sources. At this point, I really should be tagging the hospitals for failures to work. Though, it's not the hospitals really but rather the people back at the farm with the much larger corporation behind. After I've been ill myself and had to go on vacation, but not really cause I had to take time off from work. Then that's more time out of my paycheck and I still have to pay the insurance fees and whatevers left for the care. At this point, you didn't tell me more than likely that it would end up costing my career and that's just a one time thing while we're at it. Then don't forget health insurance, the biggest scam on the market. Sure, it works great in theory but what about there in the practice at a time when your paycheck's been left emptied and bare. Then too that's assuming the economy's any good and you've been one of the few that's making a profit. These are actually silos themselves if you're honest, one that's tied up with the force of the market. Heaven forbid the economy gets rocky or something should actually happen as it so often is prone. I mean, the market's risky enough without behind tied up in the health.

Dignities

What's the opposite of a dignity but an indignity as opposed to the regular sort of care as it goes. These express themselves in all types and sorts of different opinions. In fact, it's about as far opposite from the concept of justice as such a thing could possibly be. That's because indignities aren't just the regular sorts of opinions. Rather, they're things added in that cause the quality of care also to suffer. Perhaps they're due to the bias in part and some of them not. In fact, without a solid example, it's hard to tell an indignity apart save for some creeping sense of a wrong that's come in a form perhaps of a hard pill yet to swallow who knows. That's why you'll have to look closely at the two other sorts of opinions. These are justice which advocates itself for the care of the people and autonomy, the people's right to form their own sets of opinions. More than that, these are supposed to have a say in their care of some sort, whether that's a vote or a voice as in the public forums of old where everyone had their own social take on an issue. When they met up though there was a joint coming together seen on the matter, which is the whole point of justice being distributed. I mean, really who want's not to have a say in their care, which is more than a lot of people have that much for sure. The last thing you'd want is a doctor standing over you reading your will. What's the justice or the point of that then when you should have done a lot more besides while you were living besides just the leaving I'm told. This is where a proper conception of healthcare comes in. It should be little more than a tool for the use of the health as needed by person or perhaps healthcare system. Then again, the public really ought to be enriched in the process or benefited somewhat by the refreshment it brings, rather than left gasping, reeling from their latest close run-in with death. The provider's learning will assist in this aim as you your story will tell as one that has risen as though up from the dust. At this point really all things as the good book says become possible to them that receive.