Finding in Relative Circles

Basically all that's to say, I could run circles around those things really in what's exactly 111.11 in any direction from the center right there. Though, this loop will keep me from running into the things of the next, I'm very much positive really or so on from then relatively in a manner of speaking. With that in mind, there's absolutely nothing wrong let's say in having a view. Everything runs about in circles though where all things are relative and nothing's if ever connected. Guess that's what's wrong with intersection that follows, much as you would in an apartment building, kept well apart from the rest, always running to and from something and there back again. When all that's considered really, you could just find the area of the circle and keep it quite simple. It's from the radius, that one central point in the middle all the way out to the edges or so that are visible. It's not however, the whole measurement across from one side to the other, which in this case would be

111.11

111.11

_______

222.22

Due to the adding of two radius together when contained in a circle. If you want to say make it an oval, you'll need to cut the circle into pieces, let's say right down the middle or in quarters and then figure out the rest simply from adding it up. In this case for the circle, you'll want to multiply the radius, 111.11, twice down the middle.

111.11

111.11

___________

11111

111110

1111100

11111000

111110000

__________

12345.4321

Which is 12,345.4321 multiplied by 3.14 which would be oh I don't know, we'll check again in a minute. The formula written out comes to be

3.14 x radius x radius = circular area

38,764.656794 is the final result, but it's never quite entirely accurate simply due to the circle's technical nature. There's 3.14 that's a repeating number if only from there. It'd look like

3.14159265358997932384626433832795

And so on perpetually speaking. It's only just been rounded up or down in the middle. That's when the person who did the equation decided to call it off at that particular angle. If they'd chosen to do it one later, it'd then become something like

3.142

When seen once again. Can you show the work of how I got to that part? I mean, the one expressed by the formula which is radius x radius going into 3.14 perpetually speaking until it's called off at the end. If you can, what do you think? It reminds me a bit too much of eternity central where forever's the only thing certain and everything else as messed up as it seems.