Calculations in Variability Later
When factored into the least smallest sums, that's
500
25, 20, 5, 100
5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 10, 10
or
5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5
5, 5, 2, 2, 5, 5, 2, 5, 2 5
Let's isolate the two scenario conditions, since obviously something's got to be changing. There's
5, 5, 2, 2, 5
Which is much truer to Scripture or the other one where the 5 and the 100 have taken up being into much the following figure.
5, 2, 5, 2, 5
Yeah, there's the same pattern again. I'm more than willing to say we can count on this possibly not working. Still though, I'm willing to give it a good shot to consider. First though I want to do one more thing to show the state of actual being. We can always try checking the sum of the squares by putting 9 into 5000 there once again.
9 into 5000
5
____________
45
_____________
50
Yeah, so that's gonna be 555.55 repeating or 555.56 rounded off at the end. Basically, there's got to be some other way of figuring out the space in the middle. I also want to know just how large those of the sections will end up of being. Then, there's also where to put the columns and how far apart the spacing should be. Let's go ahead and try the actual figure. Due to all the difficulty we've been having so far, we'll just use the length of the possible longest in sides. That's assuming the columns come out all the way to the edges like an H shape in the largest of squares though without an – in the middle and more like an l=l. That's not any better then is it of a sort very much rather. Let's just go ahead and make the assumption, then we'll just say that the supports are only around in the 500 square footed region of being. I'm sure there's a happier medium, but when you've gotten whole trees for the roofs, this construction doesn't seem in the least bit outdated. Technically, it could work then, you know. Maybe just maybe, we'll need to test all the possibilities and then go with the most strongest in structure.
15 into 50
3
_________
45
_________
50
Yeah, that's gonna be 3.333 feet repeating at regular spaces, assuming it's all the way there and then. There's one other possibility that you'll see in a minute, of not having an abbreviation in structural edges. The advantage of that sort of construction is the giving of multiple exits around in the building which is especially needful when you've got large crowds of people around for a minute or two more than is expected. That's due to risks of fire, flood, storm, earthquake, natural disaster, or any other type of a stress to report. Then there's
15 into 100
6
__________
90
__________
100
In case you can't already tell, that's gonna be 6.66 repeating so far or 6.67 rounded up on the end of things relative speaking. After all that, I'd say this likely doesn't seem like the soundest construction given what we've already seen from this numerical pattern of being. Likely the longer side is liable for a collapse at some point to happen. The only reason I can make that assumption reasonably is judging from the pattern already that's happened. Then, I'll just say, what if we did this all over again. No, I don't mean from the very beginning, just a new way of figuring.
500 square foot
Well, we already know the 5 and 100 some isn't going to work well right from the start. It's running into an SOS pattern and also the same repeating 6.66s we'd seen earlier without really thinking. That leaves us to try the 20 and 25 method just to determine where 500 square foot leaves you at in the figure. I'm sure there's other possible sums that go into 500 once and again. Perhaps you can figure out some others probability speaking and maybe these too will reach results once again. I'll let you try it on your own for a bit.