Calculations in Variability Later

06/20/2025

When factored into the least smallest sums, that is

500

25, 20, 5, 100

5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 10, 10

or

5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5

5, 5, 2, 2, 5, 5, 2, 5, 2 5

Let us isolate the two scenario conditions, since obviously something has got to be changing. There is

5, 5, 2, 2, 5

Which is much truer to Scripture or the other one where the 5 and the 100 have taken up being into much the following figure.

5, 2, 5, 2, 5

Yeah, there is the same pattern again. I was more than willing to say we can count on this possibly not working. Still though, I was willing to give it a good shot to consider. First though I want to do one more thing to show the state of actual being. We can always try checking the sum of the squares by putting 9 into 5000 there once again.

9 into 5000

5

____________

45

_____________

50

Yeah, so that is gonna be 555.55 repeating or 555.56 rounded off at the end. Basically, there is got to be some other way of figuring out the space in the middle. I also want to know just how large those of the sections will end up of being. Then, there is also where to put the columns and how far apart the spacing should be. Let us go ahead and try the actual figure. Due to all the difficulty we have been having so far, we would just use the length of the possible longest in sides. That is assuming the columns come out all the way to the edges like an H shape in the largest of squares though without an – in the middle and more like an l=l. That is not any better then is it of a sort very much rather. Let us just go ahead and make the assumption, then we would just say that the supports are only around in the 500 square footed region of being. I was sure there is a happier medium, but when you have gotten whole trees for the roofs, this construction does not seem in the least bit outdated. Technically, it could work then, you know. Maybe just maybe, we would need to test all the possibilities and then go with the most strongest in structure.

15 into 50

3

_________

45

_________

50

Yeah, that is gonna be 3.333 feet repeating at regular spaces, assuming it is all the way there and then. There is one other possibility that you would see in a minute, of not having an abbreviation in structural edges. The advantage of that sort of construction is the giving of multiple exits around in the building which is especially needful when you have got large crowds of people around for a minute or two more than is expected. That is due to risks of fire, flood, storm, earthquake, natural disaster, or any other type of a stress to report. Then there is

15 into 100

6

__________

90

__________

100

In case you cannot already tell, that is gonna be 6.66 repeating so far or 6.67 rounded up on the end of things relative speaking. After all that, Ihad say this likely does not seem like the soundest construction given what we have already seen from this numerical pattern of being. Likely the longer side is liable for a collapse at some point to happen. The only reason I can make that assumption reasonably is judging from the pattern already that is happened. Then, I would just say, what if we did this all over again. No, I do not mean from the very beginning, just a new way of figuring.

500 square foot

Well, we already know the 5 and 100 some is not going to work well right from the start. It is running into an SOS pattern and also the same repeating 6.66s we had seen earlier without really thinking. That leaves us to try the 20 and 25 method just to determine where 500 square foot leaves you at in the figure. I was sure there is other possible sums that go into 500 once and again. Perhaps you can figure out some others probability speaking and maybe these too will reach results once again. I would let you try it on your own for a bit.